Welcome to our playground.

If you want to return here, bookmark this page.

Below you’ll find a bunch of live pages which we extracted from the Assessment or Planning Explorers our clients use for planning. The first four are for districts, used by LCAP teams in California. The last one is for a high school.

Each of the visualizations contains the client (which appears in orange) plus 15 similar schools or districts. Framing the client this way lets them answer the question: “Where do we stand, compared to other schools (or districts) like our own?”

What does “like our own” mean? It means highly similar systems: same grade range served, similar enrollment. And it means highly similar students, based on the factors that districts do not control: parent education, English language fluency and free-lunch status. This makes for customized tools that fit like a glove. The comparisons control as much as possible for differences among students.

Look at the mean scale scores of semi-stable groups of students (graduating class cohorts) over three or four years’ time. We’ve organized the results so you can see Morgan Hills’ students scores compared to the state average (black bar) and to 15 other districts whose students are very similar to their own.

Here are three questions to explore. Look at Morgan Hill’s class of 2022. Are their results more or less different than the results of other graduating class cohorts at Morgan Hill?

What other districts show similar patterns of low rates of growth (or even declining average scale scores).

What do you see when you compare results of low-income and not-low-income students in the class of 2022?

Go to Tableau Gallery

When you're done playing,
let us know if you'd like to see more...

Look at the rate at which high school students in Morgan Hill USD enrolled in A-to-G courses. (These are the courses UC and CSU require of applicants.) In each of these four core-course subjects, the rate ranges from middle to top quartile of this set of highly similar districts. What we’re showing you is the percentage of all enrollments in any of these four subjects that were in the A-to-G level courses. Note that you can select subgroups of students. If you do, you’ll see them compared to the same subgroup of students in all 15 similar districts.

Here are three questions to start you exploring. First, how do you think Morgan Hill is doing compared to its neighbor, Gilroy USD, in each of these four core course subjects? Note that the state average factor for A-to-G enrollments is represented by the black line.

Second, look at these A-to-G enrollments in 2015 for Morgan Hill’s students. How would you characterize the enrollment rates in A-to-G courses in 2018 compared to the rates in 2015?

Third, compare the rates of A-to-G course enrollments for boys and girls. Look closely at math, in particular. How would you describe the difference?

Go to Tableau Gallery

When you're done playing,
let us know if you'd like to see more...

The graduation rate alone is a very incomplete measure of what graduates have studied and perhaps learned. By combining a measure of the graduates who have met the A-to-G requirements of UC and CSU, and showing this next to the overall graduation rate (cohort based), we might be able to understand how to answer more difficult questions about the education different students attain.

Here are three questions to start you exploring. First, look just at the A-to-G grads as a share of total grads in the right-hand leaderboard. Exclude the highest (Natomas USD) and lowest (South San Francisco USD) districts. How would you describe the range of the remaining 14 districts — whose students, by the way, are highly similar.

Second, look at the A-to-G grad rate of Latino/Hispanic students. Then look at the A-to-G grad rate of white students. How many other districts had a similar degree of difference in the A-to-G grad rate?

Third, look at the difference between boys and girls in their 2018 A-to-G grad rate and their overall grad rate. Did these rates look different in 2017? How would you characterize the degree of difference?

Go to Tableau Gallery

When you're done playing,
let us know if you'd like to see more...

Look at the degree to which the students in 15 other high schools are similar to the students in Live Oak High in Morgan Hill USD. We’ve matched these high schools based on three student factors that most directly affect their education, based on the research we relied upon: (a) parent level of education; (b) students’ English language fluency; and (c) free-and-reduced-price lunch status of students. Each of these three factors appears in one row. So each district’s dot appears three times — once on each row. Live Oak High appears in orange, and sits at the zero mark. The horizontal axis is a measure of the degree of difference of each high school from Live Oak High.

Here are three questions to start you exploring. First, how tightly do these 15 similar schools fit the students at Live Oak High? Reference the scale to the left and right of the zero mark (where Live Oak High sits).

Second, put your cursor on each school’s name, in the table. You’ll see the corresponding dots for that school pop out in the bubble chart below. Try to find the school that most closely fits Live Oak High.

Third, given how tightly these other schools fit Live Oak High, do you think they make a fair comparison set for evaluating dropout and graduation rates? Which schools would you exclude if you were to choose the seven that you felt were best suited to answer that question.

Go to Tableau Gallery

When you're done playing,
let us know if you'd like to see more...